Question: 6 -
Statements: No bat is ball. No ball is wicket. Conclusions:
-
Only conclusion I follows
-
Only conclusion II follows
-
Either I or II follows
-
Neither I nor II follows
Answer:
Neither I nor II follows
Solution:
Since both the premises are negative, no definite conclusion follows.
Since both the premises are negative, no definite conclusion follows.
Question: 7 -
Statements: All flowers are trees. No fruit is tree. Conclusions:
-
Only conclusion II follows
-
Only conclusion I follows
-
Neither I nor II follows
-
Both I and II follow
Answer:
Both I and II follow
Solution:
As discussed above, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No flower is fruit'. I is the converse of this conclusion and thus it follows. II is the converse of the first premise and so it also holds.
As discussed above, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No flower is fruit'. I is the converse of this conclusion and thus it follows. II is the converse of the first premise and so it also holds.
Question: 8 -
Statements: All roads are waters. Some waters are boats. Conclusions:
-
Neither I nor II follows
-
Either I or II follows
-
Only conclusion II follows
-
Only conclusion I follows
Answer:
Neither I nor II follows
Solution:
The first premise is A type and distributes the subject. So, the middle term 'waters' which forms its predicate, is not distributed. The second premise is I type and does not distribute either subject or predicate. So, the middle term 'waters' forming its subject is not distributed. Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.
The first premise is A type and distributes the subject. So, the middle term 'waters' which forms its predicate, is not distributed. The second premise is I type and does not distribute either subject or predicate. So, the middle term 'waters' forming its subject is not distributed. Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.
Question: 9 -
Statements: Every minister is a student. Every student is inexperienced. Conclusions:
-
Both I and II follow
-
Only conclusion I follows
-
Neither I nor II follows
-
Only conclusion II follows
Answer:
Both I and II follow
Solution:
'Every' is equivalent to 'All'. Thus, since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, I follows. II is the converse of the second premise and thus it also holds.
'Every' is equivalent to 'All'. Thus, since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, I follows. II is the converse of the second premise and thus it also holds.
Question: 10 -
Statements: All roads are poles. No pole is a house. Conclusions:
-
Only conclusion I follows
-
Neither I nor II follows
-
Both I and II follow
-
Only conclusion II follows
Answer:
Neither I nor II follows
Solution:
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative. So, neither I nor II follows.
Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative. So, neither I nor II follows.